newYou can listen to Fox’s news articles!
Prince Harry After he retreated as a senior royal, he lost his appeal, which challenged the British government’s decision to strip him of publicly funded security.
On Friday, the Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that the Commission had not unfairly treated the Duke of Sussex when it decided to consider protection on a case-by-case basis for each visit to his home country.
The ruling is likely to bring a major bill to 40 to pay the UK government’s legal fees in addition to his own lawyer’s fees. It was not immediately clear whether the two fathers would attempt to appeal the UK Supreme Court.
Prince William cannot strip Meghan Markle of royal title, but using it may be a price: Experts
Prince Harry lost his public safety appeal in the UK. (Wiktor Szymanowicz/Anadolu Agency)
Fox News Digital reached out to Archewell, which handles the Duke of Sussex office, for comment.
The ruling upheld a decision by a High Court judge last year that found Harry’s “custom-to-do” security plan was not illegal, unreasonable or unfair.
Last month, the British prince made an unusual appearance at a two-day hearing. At the time, his lawyers alleged that his life was at risk and that the Royal Family and VIP Executive Committee had chosen him for poor treatment.
2020, Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle; They created their royal exit, citing the unbearable invasion of the British press and the lack of support from the palace. They moved to California.
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry got married in 2018 and moved to California in 2020. (Chris Jackson)
“There’s someone sitting behind me who knows a process that is clearly inferior in every way and is said to be getting a special bespoke process when he goes through it,” said lawyer Shaheed Fatima. “Here and through this charm, his presence is a powerful illustration of how much this charm means to him and his family.”
Harry’s lawyer also said he felt his family was “not protected by the agency.”
Government lawyers said Harry’s arguments repeated the false approach that failed in the lower courts.
Click here to sign up for our Entertainment Newsletter
Prince Harry offered to personally pay police security for himself and his family while visiting the UK. However, the UK government rejected the offer, saying that the police were not personal bodyguards. (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)
“It has been a continuous failure to look at wood in wood, moving forward with propositions that are only available by reading small portions of evidence, and now the judgment is out of context and ignores the entire photograph,” Attorney James Eady said.
Watch: King Charles cannot be involved in Prince Harry’s security: Author
In court, Harry’s lawyers said the Duke and Duchess of Sussex “feeled that they had been forced to retreat from the role of full-time officially working members of the royal family.” “I wanted to continue my duties,” Harry said. Supporting the late Queen As a privately funded member of the royal family. ”
As the hearing approached the end, Harry gave the vulnerable approval that he was “weary and overwhelmed” by the incident he had been looming on him for years.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are raising two young children in California. (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)
The insider said before People Magazine Harry wanted to revive his safety to allow for a more flexible visit to the UK for himself, his wife and their two children. According to one source, the prince said he wanted to work with his charity, saying, “While he is in the UK, he wants to ensure the safety of himself and his family, so that his children can know his home country.”
Telegraph previously reported that the lawsuit had affected Harry’s relationship with his father. In February 2024, Buckingham Palace announced that the 76-year-old King had been diagnosed with private cancer.
According to the outlet, Harry said “the worst fears were confirmed by the entire legal disclosure in this case – it’s really sad.”
Prince Harry has built a tense relationship with his family since he made the royal exit in 2020. (Ben Stansall/Getty Images)
Harry’s legal team claims that Lavec [the government’s Royal and VIP Executive Committee] The risks pose specifically to Harry and his family were not properly assessed. His team described the legal battle as a battle for his life, People Magazine reported.
Harry and Meghan are five-year-old Prince Archie, 3, 3, and his lawyer, who raises a 5-year-old child in California, emphasize that he “doesn’t feel safe” to bring his family to his home country without official police protection.
People Magazine reported that Harry has long insisted that his father, Charles III, as a ritual head of state, could help him restore the security he is fighting for. Under the legal doctrine of “sovereign immunity,” Charles is exempt from criminal and civil lawsuits as head of state; Time Magazine It has been reported.
Like what you’re reading? For more entertainment news click here
The insider previously told People magazine that Prince Harry felt his father, Charles III, was involved in helping his younger son. (Yui Mok/PA images via Getty Images)
Click here to get the Fox News app
Charles has risen to the throne 2022.
Sources told People Magazine that there is a distance between father and son.
“I don’t think there’s a settlement,” the insider said. “Nothing has changed.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
