The Supreme Court agreed to consider it Trump administration Challenging judges to issue national injunctions. Sets the dates for cases that could have a significant impact on the president’s ability to implement the agenda.
This comes after three federal judges issued an independent national injunction blocking executive orders by President Donald Trump End birthright citizenship For children with illegal immigrants.
On Thursday, the court merged three cases into one, setting up oral arguments to examine the fundamental question of whether district judges can issue rulings that affect the entire country.
The court will hear oral discussions on the case at 10am on May 15th. This comes about two weeks after the courts stopped listening to oral discussions before the break that normally begins in July.
Supreme Court hears oral debate in a birthright citizenship case
The Supreme Court agreed to look into the Trump administration’s challenges against judges issuing national injunctions, and dated cases that could have a major impact on the president’s ability to carry out his agenda, not just the country as a whole. (Photo by Peter Say/Anadoll Agency via Donald Trump: Getty Images | Supreme Court: Photo: Anna Money Maker/Getty Images
A national injunction is a court order that prevents the federal government from implementing policies or laws that have a cascade effect that affects the entire country, not just the parties involved in the trial.
His administration has been facing since Trump returned to his elliptical office in January Hundreds of lawsuits Targeted his executive orders and actions. Some of them stalled key parts of his agenda, including immigration enforcement, and led to national injunctions.
Almost two dozen states order to sue Trump’s managers over birthrights: “Unprecedented”
File – The US Supreme Court will be seen in Washington on March 26, 2024.
In March, the Trump administration filed an emergency appeal. The narrowing of the Supreme Court Three injunctions issued to stop Trump’s birthright being invalidated. The emergency appeal required the injunction to cover only individuals who have been directly affected by the relevant courts.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Acting Attorney General Sarah Harris, the administration’s proxy Attorney General, claimed on an emergency appeal that the national injunction had hit “a proportion of epidemics” under the second Trump administration, noting that the federal government faced 14 universal injunctions in the first three years of the Biden administration, compared to 15 people who were taken away from Trump administrators in just one month.
Not only will it affect the issue of birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, but the ultimate court decision will have a greater impact on ultimately answering the limits of federal judges’ authority to determine issues of national and international policy.
Emma Colton and Breanne Deppisch of Fox News Digital contributed to this report.
