newYou can listen to Fox’s news articles!
The Ministry of Justice (DOJ) argues that the courts should refuse California’s demands For restraint orders against the Trump administration over the decision to activate National Guard soldiers in Los Angeles after violent riots broke out over the weekend amid Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in the city.
California Democratic leaders advocate for the president Donald Trump He abused his authority by calling Title 10 provisions that allow the president to mobilize the National Guard when invasions or rebellions are ongoing.
California Government Gavin NewsomDemocrats said in a statement Monday that Trump caused much of the riots as he unnecessarily deployed troops to protect ice staff and federal buildings. Newsom also claimed that local police and state police were in control of the situation when Trump issued a National Guard declaration to encourage confusion.
Consider this issue one day before your scheduled hearing. DOJ He claimed that Trump has the authority to call on the National Guard to respond.
Sometimes: How Trump’s response to Rawiz has changed from Black Life Matter and Antifa in 2020
National Guard soldiers are holding shields as demonstrators protest outside the downtown Los Angeles prison after two days of clashes with police during anti-ice protests. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
“In a terrible political stunt that puts America’s lives at risk, the California governor is using this court to ensure that the US president exercises legal statutory and constitutional powers to ensure federal personnel and facilities are protected,” the DOJ said. “But under the constitution, the President is the commander of the Chief of the Army, and the President is responsible for ensuring the protection of federal officials and federal facilities.”
Since Friday, violent mobs opposed ICE immigration law enforcement have targeted and damaged federal buildings, injured federal officials, and hampered the federal government’s functioning, DOJ said.
Los Angeles Police Station (LAPD) and other state and local law enforcement officials were unable to bring orders to Los Angeles, the DOJ alleged.
Federal judge refuses to block Trump’s LA National Guard deployment in Newsom’s time frame
President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard in Los Angeles over the weekend as rioters continued to damage federal buildings while injuring federal officials during ice attacks around the city. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
The agency also pointed to comments by LAPD chief Jim McDonnell. He said at a press conference that “thing has become out of control,” and warned that “someone could be killed easily.”
“Recognizing the fears and threats of federal law enforcement that local and state authorities do not want to control or control, the President responded by federalizing and deploying the federation, using the authorities given to him by the statute and the constitution. California National Guard To protect federal government personnel and property, silence the MOB and restore order, the DOJ wrote.
“The President has all rights under the Constitution and will call on the National Guard and Marines to quell unlawful violence directed at enforcement of the law,” the DOJ continued. “However, instead of working to bring the order to Los Angeles, California, the governor filed a lawsuit in San Francisco and sought a court order that would limit the federal government’s ability to protect its property and officials.”
Newsom files a move to stop an emergency motion to use the military to “block” the army.
California Governor Gavin Newsom said state Attorney General Rob Bonta was watching in Celes, California. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
The DOJ said California’s demands would “oppose” the president’s military orders.
“The plaintiff’s claims about merit are unfounded,” the DOJ said.
Newsom also argued that Trump had not consulted with him before revitalizing the National Guard, but the law lacked such requirements, the DOJ said.
“It simply directs the president’s order to be communicated through the ‘governor’ as a procedural matter, the DOJ wrote. “they were.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
Historically, the courts did not interfere when former President Dwight Eisenhower deployed the troops to protect school separation. They also did not interfere when former President Richard Nixon deployed the troops to deliver mail at the post office.
Ultimately, the DOJ recommended that the court deny any claims of temporary restraining or interim injunctions in California and Newsom.
Newsom’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Fox News Digital.
Ashley Oliver of Fox News Digital contributed to this report.
