Justice Samuel Alito and Sonia Sotomayor snapped each other during Tuesday’s debate over parental rights in the LGBTQ curriculum after liberal justice tried to go back to the question as Alito spoke.
The High Court is Mahmoudv. A brief conflict broke out when I heard the discussion in Taylor. There, a coalition of parents tried to inform and solidify their children’s rights to choose from reading LGBTQ-related materials in primary schools. Their faith.
“The heat is growing in the exchanges between judges. Sotomayor tried to oppose Alito’s portrayal. Alito pushed back and asked him to finish it,” Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley observed with X.
Sotomayor initially asked Mahmoud’s lawyer Eric Baxter about a particular book entitled Uncle Bobby’s Wedding, which includes same-sex relationship storylines, and whether same-sex exposure in children’s books would be considered compulsory.
Parents Tell Scotus: Classroom LGBTQ Storybooks Clash with Our Faith
Justice Samuel Alito and Sonia Sotomayor snapped each other during Tuesday’s debate over parental rights in the LGBTQ curriculum after liberal justice tried to go back to the question as Alito spoke. (Getty)
“Our parents would disagree,” Baxter replied.
Sotomayor continued her line of questions to make Baxter’s objections more clear to the book. “Our objections will even be to read books that violate the religious beliefs of our clients,” Baxter said.
Alito then jumped in with additional questions related to the book.
“I read that book and many of these other books,” Alito began. “Do you think it’s fair to say that everything that’s happening at ‘Uncle Bobby’s Wedding’ is all about exposing children to the fact that there are men who marry other men? ”
Baxter disagreed with Alito’s question. Alito later said that the book had a “clear message and many people think it’s a good message,” but some “it’s a traditional message.” Religious beliefs “Don’t agree to that.
Sotomayor jumped in as Alito continued his explanation.
“What a minute. Reservations are -” Sotomayor has begun.
“Can I finish it?” Alito said.
“It has a clear moral message, and it could be a good message. It’s just a message that many religious people disagree,” Alito concluded.
As if the discussion was wrapped up supreme court It seemed like they were more likely to agree with their parents.
The High Court is Mahmoudv. A brief quarrel occurred when I heard the argument in Taylor. There, a coalition of parents tried to inform children by reading elementary school LGBTQ-related materials claiming conflict with faith, and solidified their right to choose them. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Union of Jewish, Christian and Muslim parents with primary school students at Montgomery County Public Schools Maryland It filed a lawsuit against the school board after introducing new LGBTQ books into its curriculum as part of the district’s “inclusiveness” initiative.
The curriculum changes came after Maryland enacted regulations seeking to promote “educational equity.” According to a petitioner’s summary filed in the High Court.
Parents lost both at district court and at appeal level. The 4th Circuit determined that parents had not shown how the policy was violated. First fix.
The incident comes at the time of the president. Donald Trump And his administration prioritized education and DEI-related reforms when he launched his second term. The Supreme Court has also heard oral debate this past semester in other religious liberty and gender-related cases.
The coalition of Jews, Christians and Muslim parents with primary school students at Montgomery County Public Schools in Maryland filed a lawsuit against the school board after introducing new LGBTQ books into their curriculum as part of the district’s “inclusiveness” initiative. (Becquet/Getty Images)
The High Court heard oral debate in a Wisconsin-based lawsuit earlier this month Catholic Charity Group bids for tax deductions. This decision may change current eligibility requirements for religious exemptions.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Fox News’ Bill Mears, Shannon Bream and David Spunt contributed to this report.
